Quick Answer
Vitamin D Muscle Strength Meta-Analysis has evidence relevant to benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Supported by this biological plausibility and by observational studies demonstrating a robust inverse association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and the risk of fractures and falls, the medical community has witnessed a global surge in vitamin D screening and empiric supplementation over the past two decades [].
Key Takeaways
- 01Supported by this biological plausibility and by observational studies demonstrating a robust inverse association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and the risk of fractures and falls, the medical community has witnessed a global surge in vitamin D screening and empiric supplementation over the past two decades []. [Kong Sung Hye (2026)]
- 02Furthermore, updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2025 have reinforced the conclusion that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce fall risk among community-dwelling older adults, with some analyses even suggesting potential harm at higher doses [-]. [Kong Sung Hye (2026)]
- 03Most notably, the 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline now recommends against empiric vitamin D supplementation in healthy adults younger than 75 years, signaling a decisive transition from universal screening toward a more targeted, risk-based approach []. [Kong Sung Hye (2026)]
- 041 2 3 Vitamin D, often termed the ‘sunshine hormone,’ has been a cornerstone of musculoskeletal preventive medicine for decades. [Kong Sung Hye (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Vitamin D Muscle Strength Meta-Analysis. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation.
- Supported by this biological plausibility and by observational studies demonstrating a robust inverse association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and the risk of fractures and falls, the medical community has witnessed a global surge in vitamin D screening and empiric supplementation over the past two decades []. [Kong Sung Hye (2026); evidence level 3]
- Furthermore, updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2025 have reinforced the conclusion that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce fall risk among community-dwelling older adults, with some analyses even suggesting potential harm at higher doses [-]. [Kong Sung Hye (2026); evidence level 3]
- Most notably, the 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline now recommends against empiric vitamin D supplementation in healthy adults younger than 75 years, signaling a decisive transition from universal screening toward a more targeted, risk-based approach []. [Kong Sung Hye (2026); evidence level 3]
- 1 2 3 Vitamin D, often termed the ‘sunshine hormone,’ has been a cornerstone of musculoskeletal preventive medicine for decades. [Kong Sung Hye (2026); evidence level 3]
- In contrast, rapid nongenomic signaling is mediated by membrane-associated VDR or by protein disulfide isomerases A3 (PDIA3), also known as membrane-associated, rapid response steroid-binding (MARRS). [Lee Ga Young (2026); evidence level 4]
Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording.
This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.
Sources