Does Sodium Bicarbonate Endurance Performance Randomized Trial work?

Updated July 2026

Quick Answer

Sodium Bicarbonate Endurance Performance Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool.

Key Takeaways

  • 01Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. [Zhu Y (2026)]
  • 02Conclusion The interventional efficacy of menthol in the heat appears to be co-regulated by the administration route and the specific exercise task. [Zhu Y (2026)]
  • 03While the current evidence does not establish definitive superiority among the administration routes due to the lack of statistical significance, ingestion may serve as an exploratory option for long-duration endurance events, whereas mouth rinsing could be considered for tasks focusing on instantaneous power output. [Zhu Y (2026)]
  • 04Objective This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to systematically evaluate and compare the relative efficacy of three menthol administration routes-ingestion (ING), mouth rinsing (MR), and topical application (Top)-on exercise performance and physiological responses in the heat, aiming to explore potential task-oriented personalized supplementation strategies. [Zhu Y (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Sodium Bicarbonate Endurance Performance Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. [Zhu Y (2026); evidence level 1] - Conclusion The interventional efficacy of menthol in the heat appears to be co-regulated by the administration route and the specific exercise task. [Zhu Y (2026); evidence level 1] - While the current evidence does not establish definitive superiority among the administration routes due to the lack of statistical significance, ingestion may serve as an exploratory option for long-duration endurance events, whereas mouth rinsing could be considered for tasks focusing on instantaneous power output. [Zhu Y (2026); evidence level 1] - Objective This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to systematically evaluate and compare the relative efficacy of three menthol administration routes-ingestion (ING), mouth rinsing (MR), and topical application (Top)-on exercise performance and physiological responses in the heat, aiming to explore potential task-oriented personalized supplementation strategies. [Zhu Y (2026); evidence level 1] - No significant differences were found under any condition for RPE, EMG, and KE repetitions. [Williams MLA (2025); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. Effects of different menthol administration routes on endurance performance and physiological responses in the heat: a network meta-analysis.
  2. No Ergogenic Effect of Caffeine or Sodium Bicarbonate on Resistance Exercise Performance: A Double-Blind Crossover Study with Sex-Based Analysis.