Quick Answer
Hyaluronic Acid Joint Pain Meta-Analysis has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Conclusion Ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injection and supervised rehabilitation produced comparable and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and shoulder mobility in frozen-phase adhesive capsulitis.
Key Takeaways
- 01Conclusion Ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injection and supervised rehabilitation produced comparable and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and shoulder mobility in frozen-phase adhesive capsulitis. [Chang CY (2026)]
- 02Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection versus supervised rehabilitation in patients with frozen-phase adhesive capsulitis. [Chang CY (2026)]
- 03Design Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 26-week follow-up. [Chang CY (2026)]
- 04To ensure a robust synthesis of evidence, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (2020-2025) for high-quality clinical trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines. [Wang H (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Hyaluronic Acid Joint Pain Meta-Analysis. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove.
- Conclusion Ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injection and supervised rehabilitation produced comparable and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and shoulder mobility in frozen-phase adhesive capsulitis. [Chang CY (2026); evidence level 2]
- Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection versus supervised rehabilitation in patients with frozen-phase adhesive capsulitis. [Chang CY (2026); evidence level 2]
- Design Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 26-week follow-up. [Chang CY (2026); evidence level 2]
- To ensure a robust synthesis of evidence, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (2020-2025) for high-quality clinical trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines. [Wang H (2026); evidence level 4]
- This narrative review evaluates the clinical transition from reactive, surgery-centric models to a proactive, integrated framework to mitigate the profound socioeconomic burden and functional decline associated with the disease. [Wang H (2026); evidence level 4]
Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording.
This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.
Sources