Calcium Sleep Latency Randomized Trial: What the Evidence Says

Quick Answer

Calcium Sleep Latency Randomized Trial has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are systematic review, randomized trial, so conclusions should be framed as evidence-aware guidance rather than medical advice.

Key Takeaways

• This page is generated only from sources stored in the Migaku evidence knowledge base.
• Current evidence mix: 1 systematic review, 1 randomized trial.
• Claims should be interpreted with the source type, study design, population, and publication date in mind.
• This article is educational and does not replace care from a qualified clinician.

Evidence Map

What The Sources Report

• Evidence on specific supplements suggests potential but limited benefit to dancers. [Vela-Andreu Marian (2026); evidence level 1]
• Vitamin D insufficiency has been associated with increased risk of musculoskeletal injury, and interventional studies in a small population of dancers suggest potential reductions in injury incidence and enhanced muscle function with supplementation, although dancer-specific evidence remains scarce. [Vela-Andreu Marian (2026); evidence level 1]
• However, long-term use of these therapies, such as benzodiazepine receptor agonists, sedating antidepressants, and antiepileptics, is associated with serious adverse effects (Sleep Foundation ). [Doma Katarina M. (2026); evidence level 2]
• The MT1 receptor is mainly associated with the regulation of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, whereas MT2 regulates non-REM sleep (NREM) (Gobbi and Comai ). [Doma Katarina M. (2026); evidence level 2]

How To Read This Evidence

Evidence level 1 generally reflects systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Level 2 includes randomized trials, guidelines, or public-health guidance. Level 3 usually reflects observational or narrative-review evidence. Level 4 is weaker or early-stage evidence. The level is a sorting aid, not a final quality grade.

Practical Interpretation

There is at least one systematic-review style source in the current set, so it deserves more weight than single-study evidence. There is trial evidence in the current set, but population and intervention details still matter. For calcium sleep latency randomized trial, the next editorial step is to add more targeted sources and separate strong findings from early or indirect evidence.

Limits Of This First Pass

This is a small-batch MVP article. It uses the first ingested sources for this topic and should be expanded with more targeted searches, license review, and human editorial checks before being treated as a definitive review.

References

• Vela-Andreu Marian (2026). Dietary supplement and medication use in professional and pre-professional dancers: widespread use but limited evidence of benefit—a systematic review. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1850279. PMCID: PMC13275222. PMID: 42325513. License: CC BY 4.0. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13275222/
• Doma Katarina M. (2026). A Randomized, Triple‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial Investigating Safety and Efficacy of Corn Leaf Extract on Sleep Quality in a Healthy Population With Difficulty Falling or Staying Asleep. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.71285. PMCID: PMC12759108. PMID: 41488152. License: CC BY 4.0. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12759108/

Safety Note

Health information can change, and individual risk depends on medical history, medications, pregnancy status, age, and diagnosis. Talk with a qualified clinician before changing treatment, supplement, or medication routines.