Does Prune Constipation Randomized Trial work?

Updated July 2026

Quick Answer

Prune Constipation Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P Conclusion Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection.

Key Takeaways

  • 01LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P Conclusion Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. [Pyo DH (2025)]
  • 02Purpose Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. [Pyo DH (2025)]
  • 03The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS. [Pyo DH (2025)]
  • 04Results Thai massage significantly reduced constipation severity (-6.71 ± 2.84), pain (-5.55 ± 1.92), and improved stool consistency (-2.03 ± 0.84) compared to the prune and control groups. [Assadollahzadeh A (2025)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Prune Constipation Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P Conclusion Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - Purpose Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - Results Thai massage significantly reduced constipation severity (-6.71 ± 2.84), pain (-5.55 ± 1.92), and improved stool consistency (-2.03 ± 0.84) compared to the prune and control groups. [Assadollahzadeh A (2025); evidence level 2] - Mechanistically, massage likely improved colonic motility and reduced anorectal discomfort. [Assadollahzadeh A (2025); evidence level 2] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. Effects of prune consumption on the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
  2. Comparative effects of traditional Thai abdominal massage versus prune consumption on constipation and quality of life in elderly women: A randomized controlled trial.