Does Maca Stress Support Randomized Trial work?

Updated October 2026

Quick Answer

Maca Stress Support Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Aeromonas caviae is a pathogenic microorganism that causes a wide spectrum of diseases in fish and humans and is often associated with aquatic environments and isolated from foods and animals.

Key Takeaways

  • 01Aeromonas caviae is a pathogenic microorganism that causes a wide spectrum of diseases in fish and humans and is often associated with aquatic environments and isolated from foods and animals. [Moreira VH (2025)]
  • 02The increasing prevalence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria represent a serious concern for public health. [Moreira VH (2025)]
  • 03A prospective cohort study of 428 couples in infertility clinics found that 29% of couples used a CAM modality for infertility treatment, with 17% specifically using herbal therapies over the course of 18 months (). [Friedman Julie (2023)]
  • 04Concurrent use of herbal medicines with prescription medications is reported among 20%–30% of prescription drug users in the United States; there is evidence via in vitro and in vivo studies that herbal therapies can act as metabolic inhibitors or inducers of prescription medications when used in combination (). [Friedman Julie (2023)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Maca Stress Support Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - Aeromonas caviae is a pathogenic microorganism that causes a wide spectrum of diseases in fish and humans and is often associated with aquatic environments and isolated from foods and animals. [Moreira VH (2025); evidence level 4] - The increasing prevalence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria represent a serious concern for public health. [Moreira VH (2025); evidence level 4] - A prospective cohort study of 428 couples in infertility clinics found that 29% of couples used a CAM modality for infertility treatment, with 17% specifically using herbal therapies over the course of 18 months (). [Friedman Julie (2023); evidence level 4] - Concurrent use of herbal medicines with prescription medications is reported among 20%–30% of prescription drug users in the United States; there is evidence via in vitro and in vivo studies that herbal therapies can act as metabolic inhibitors or inducers of prescription medications when used in combination (). [Friedman Julie (2023); evidence level 4] - Risks of herbal-drug interactions span from side effects (eg, bleeding, cardiotoxicity, hypoglycemia, hypotension) to altered pharmacokinetics (eg, decreased absorption, increased metabolism) of medications (). [Friedman Julie (2023); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. <i>Aeromonas caviae</i> subsp. <i>aquatica</i> subsp. nov., a New Multidrug-Resistant Subspecies Isolated from a Drinking Water Storage Tank.
  2. Herbal supplement use among reproductive-aged women in an academic infertility practice