Does Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Exercise Performance Meta-Analysis work?

The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Exercise Performance Meta-Analysis. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - No effect of CHO mouth rinse on muscular endurance, maximum power output, or maximum oxygen consumption (VO 2 max) was found ( p > 0.05). [Zalagkitis C (2026); evidence level 1] - Conclusions : The available evidence suggests that CHO mouth rinse can produce a small, outcome-dependent ergogenic effect in distance covered, performance time and speed performance as well as small improvements in workload, with less robust evidence for MVC-evidence that mainly applies to male participants. [Zalagkitis C (2026); evidence level 1] - Objective : The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the acute effects of carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse on exercise capacity and performance in humans of any health and fitness status. [Zalagkitis C (2026); evidence level 1] - Eligibility criteria included adult humans > 18 years old at any health and fitness status undertaking any CHO mouth rinse prior and during of any type of acute exercise session. [Zalagkitis C (2026); evidence level 1] - RoB 2 and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) were used to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence. [Li Q (2026); evidence level 1] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.