Does Beetroot Eye Fatigue Randomized Trial work?

Updated August 2026

Quick Answer

Beetroot Eye Fatigue Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: 7 1,4,8–10 1 11 Exogenous antioxidants can influence EIOS, and some evidence suggests that they may attenuate the ROS-mediated pathways necessary for training adaptations [].

Key Takeaways

  • 017 1,4,8–10 1 11 Exogenous antioxidants can influence EIOS, and some evidence suggests that they may attenuate the ROS-mediated pathways necessary for training adaptations []. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026)]
  • 02Current evidence supports supplementation, primarily when correcting an insufficiency or deficiency, meeting dietary needs that cannot be met through food, or during periods of elevated stress, such as overreaching, back-to-back competitions, or in austere environments (e.g. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026)]
  • 03Based on the available evidence, the dietary antioxidants discussed in this position stand are rated by the authors as having weak, moderate, or high levels of support for improving exercise- and sport-related outcomes. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026)]
  • 04strength and conditioning coaches, sports dietitians, and tactical facilitators) frequently seek strategies to gain a competitive edge. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Beetroot Eye Fatigue Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - 7 1,4,8–10 1 11 Exogenous antioxidants can influence EIOS, and some evidence suggests that they may attenuate the ROS-mediated pathways necessary for training adaptations []. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 3] - Current evidence supports supplementation, primarily when correcting an insufficiency or deficiency, meeting dietary needs that cannot be met through food, or during periods of elevated stress, such as overreaching, back-to-back competitions, or in austere environments (e.g. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 3] - Based on the available evidence, the dietary antioxidants discussed in this position stand are rated by the authors as having weak, moderate, or high levels of support for improving exercise- and sport-related outcomes. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 3] - strength and conditioning coaches, sports dietitians, and tactical facilitators) frequently seek strategies to gain a competitive edge. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 3] - Concurrently, the lifestyle associated with esports, characterized by physical inactivity, extended screen time, disrupted sleep cycles, and high psychological stress, poses risks to both short and long-term health [,]. [Georgiou Loizos (2026); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: effects of dietary antioxidants on exercise and sports performance
  2. Personalized Nutrition, Lifestyle, and Supplementation Strategies to Support Cognitive Performance and Well-Being in Esports Athletes: A Narrative Review