Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Evidence Table

Structured evidence table for Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis, generated from 2 reusable source documents in the Migaku knowledge base.

topicclaimevidence levelcitationsource
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisThe analysis calculated summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the risk of hypertension by comparing the highest versus lowest levels of circulating selenium and using random-effects models.1Khodadadi H (2025)Dose-response association between circulating selenium and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisThe highest versus lowest level of circulating selenium was not significantly related to risk of hypertension (RR:1.15; 95% CI: 0.99-1.33).1Khodadadi H (2025)Dose-response association between circulating selenium and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-Analysislowest circulating selenium was associated with a 36% higher risk of hypertension in women (95% CI: 1.03-1.81).1Khodadadi H (2025)Dose-response association between circulating selenium and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisAim and scope Hypertension is considered a global health issue due to its growing prevalence.1Khodadadi H (2025)Dose-response association between circulating selenium and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisDespite major advancements in pharmacotherapies and interventional cardiology, substantial residual risk persists among patients with established disease ().3Wu Xun (2026)Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisAdditionally, many nutraceuticals are perceived to possess favorable safety and tolerability profiles compared to conventional medications, making them attractive for long-term risk reduction ().3Wu Xun (2026)Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisBanach et al., 2018 Cicero et al., 2017 Sesso et al., 2008 However, the field is marked by heterogeneous and sometimes contradictory evidence.3Wu Xun (2026)Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives
Selenium Blood Pressure Meta-AnalysisRoth et al., 2020 Ganda et al., 2018 Visseren et al., 2021 Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for nearly one-third of global deaths each year ().3Wu Xun (2026)Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives

Source documents

  1. Dose-response association between circulating selenium and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  2. Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives