evidence table

Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial Evidence Table

Structured evidence table for Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial, generated from 2 reusable source documents in the Migaku knowledge base.

topicclaimevidence levelcitationsource
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialResearch showing evidence for the broad and narrow focus of attention has used a wide range of paradigms, but mainly digits as stimuli (such as arithmetic updating task; e.g., Oberauer and Hein).4Artuso Caterina (2022)Effects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialIn general, it has been shown that lexical LTM associations facilitate the WM recall process (Hulme et al.); specifically, the more strongly items are associated in LTM (e.g., more frequently associated), the more recall performance will benefit.4Artuso Caterina (2022)Effects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialOn the other hand, studies on WM updating (see Artuso and Palladino) demonstrated the opposite result: Strong sub-lexical associations from LTM are dismantled and updated with greater difficulty (i.e., they require longer RTs).4Artuso Caterina (2022)Effects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialThe two constructs of working memory (WM) and short-term memory (STM) refer to memories that are active over a brief period of time.4Artuso Caterina (2022)Effects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialOverall, the findings of the present experiments provide evidence that the efficacy of false memory priming extends to complex analogical reasoning problems.4Howe ML (2015)Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialLike true memories, false memories are capable of priming answers to insight-based problems.4Howe ML (2015)Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.
Lion S Mane Memory Randomized TrialRecent research has attempted to extend this paradigm to more advanced problem-solving tasks, including those involving verbal analogical reasoning.4Howe ML (2015)Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimResearch showing evidence for the broad and narrow focus of attention has used a wide range of paradigms, but mainly digits as stimuli (such as arithmetic updating task; e.g., Oberauer and Hein).
evidence level4
citationArtuso Caterina (2022)
sourceEffects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimIn general, it has been shown that lexical LTM associations facilitate the WM recall process (Hulme et al.); specifically, the more strongly items are associated in LTM (e.g., more frequently associated), the more recall performance will benefit.
evidence level4
citationArtuso Caterina (2022)
sourceEffects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimOn the other hand, studies on WM updating (see Artuso and Palladino) demonstrated the opposite result: Strong sub-lexical associations from LTM are dismantled and updated with greater difficulty (i.e., they require longer RTs).
evidence level4
citationArtuso Caterina (2022)
sourceEffects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimThe two constructs of working memory (WM) and short-term memory (STM) refer to memories that are active over a brief period of time.
evidence level4
citationArtuso Caterina (2022)
sourceEffects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimOverall, the findings of the present experiments provide evidence that the efficacy of false memory priming extends to complex analogical reasoning problems.
evidence level4
citationHowe ML (2015)
sourcePriming analogical reasoning with false memories.
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimLike true memories, false memories are capable of priming answers to insight-based problems.
evidence level4
citationHowe ML (2015)
sourcePriming analogical reasoning with false memories.
topicLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial
claimRecent research has attempted to extend this paradigm to more advanced problem-solving tasks, including those involving verbal analogical reasoning.
evidence level4
citationHowe ML (2015)
sourcePriming analogical reasoning with false memories.

Learn next

Related evidence and supplement guides

SupplementLion's Mane MushroomMedicinal mushroom that stimulates nerve growth factor — supporting memory, nerve repair, and mo...GuideLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial: What the Evidence SaysLion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence databa...GuideLion's Mane Cognition Randomized Trial: What the Evidence SaysLion's Mane Cognition Randomized Trial has 3 source documents in the current Migaku evidence dat...GuideCreatine Working Memory Randomized Trial: What the Evidence SaysCreatine Working Memory Randomized Trial has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence d...GuideMagnesium Threonate Memory Randomized Trial: What the Evidence SaysMagnesium Threonate Memory Randomized Trial has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidenc...RankingBest Nootropics for Focus & Cognition: 2026 Clinical RankingsAn examination of cognitive enhancers designed to increase neurotransmitter activity, improve sy...AnswerDoes Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial work?Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the s...AnswerIs Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial safe?Lion S Mane Memory Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to safety, limits, and clinician-discu...

Source documents

  1. Effects of semantic relationship and preactivation on memory updating
  2. Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.