Structured evidence table for Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis, generated from 2 reusable source documents in the Migaku knowledge base.
| topic | claim | evidence level | citation | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | 1 2 Cardiac arrest is associated with high mortality and morbidity, even after successful resuscitation.,While intravascular volume therapy is recognised as a standard component of shock management,its role during and after cardiac arrest remains uncertain. | 1 | Wittig Johannes (2026) | Volume therapy for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | The last systematic review on this topic was conducted by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in 2010, which concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the routine use of intravenous fluids during cardiac arrest.With new evidence available, an updated systematic review is needed to inform the international guidelines. | 1 | Wittig Johannes (2026) | Volume therapy for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | The aim of this systematic review was to identify, assess, and synthesize the clinical evidence on intra- and post-cardiac arrest volume therapy for adults and children. | 1 | Wittig Johannes (2026) | Volume therapy for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | 5 6 During cardiac arrest, volume therapy is only recommended in cases when hypovolaemia is evident or suspected.Identifying hypovolaemia during cardiac arrest is challenging, and fluids are sometimes administered empirically during resuscitation. | 1 | Wittig Johannes (2026) | Volume therapy for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | Moderate evidence indicated that IHG reduced SBP (-5.38 mmHg, 95% CI -6.91 to -3.85; p 2 = 86% and DBP (-2.71 mmHg, 95% CI -3.75 to -1.66; p 2 = 90%), with greater effects observed in hypertensive compared to normotensive groups. | 1 | Lin CW (2026) | The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | For meta-regression, lower training intensity protocols ( 3 to 7 days/week) was associated with a diminished effect in SBP (p = 0.032). | 1 | Lin CW (2026) | The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | In conclusion, the IHG training significantly lowers SBP and DBP in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals, offering preventive benefits for normotensive individuals at risk for hypertension and therapeutic potential for hypertensive patients. | 1 | Lin CW (2026) | The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Chia Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis | The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the dose-response relationship between isometric handgrip (IHG) training and blood pressure outcomes in normotensive and hypertensive populations. | 1 | Lin CW (2026) | The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
Source documents