Boswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis Evidence Table

Structured evidence table for Boswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis, generated from 1 reusable source document in the Migaku knowledge base.

topicclaimevidence levelcitationsource
Boswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis11 12 12 11 13 Current pharmacological treatments provide inconsistent long-term efficacy and are associated with significant side effects [].3Giglio Mariateresa (2025)Efficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
Boswellia Recovery Meta-AnalysisNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), though effective for inflammation, offer limited relief in CLBP with neuropathic components and may be associated with gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal complications with prolonged use [].3Giglio Mariateresa (2025)Efficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
Boswellia Recovery Meta-AnalysisOpioids, despite their widespread use, lack evidence for long-term effectiveness in CLBP and pose serious risks, including tolerance, dependence, addiction, and misuse, prompting recommendations for restricted use [,].3Giglio Mariateresa (2025)Efficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
Boswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 10 Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting approximately 619 million people globally in 2020, with projections indicating that this number could rise to 843 million by 2050 [].3Giglio Mariateresa (2025)Efficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
topicBoswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis
claim11 12 12 11 13 Current pharmacological treatments provide inconsistent long-term efficacy and are associated with significant side effects [].
evidence level3
citationGiglio Mariateresa (2025)
sourceEfficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
topicBoswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis
claimNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), though effective for inflammation, offer limited relief in CLBP with neuropathic components and may be associated with gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal complications with prolonged use [].
evidence level3
citationGiglio Mariateresa (2025)
sourceEfficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
topicBoswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis
claimOpioids, despite their widespread use, lack evidence for long-term effectiveness in CLBP and pose serious risks, including tolerance, dependence, addiction, and misuse, prompting recommendations for restricted use [,].
evidence level3
citationGiglio Mariateresa (2025)
sourceEfficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study
topicBoswellia Recovery Meta-Analysis
claim1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 10 Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting approximately 619 million people globally in 2020, with projections indicating that this number could rise to 843 million by 2050 [].
evidence level3
citationGiglio Mariateresa (2025)
sourceEfficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study

Source documents

  1. Efficacy and Safety of Acmella oleracea and Boswellia serrata Extract as Add-On Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: An Observational, Real-World Cohort Study