What does the evidence say about Vitamin D Exercise Recovery Randomized Trial?

Updated October 2026

Quick Answer

Vitamin D Exercise Recovery Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: However, human evidence remains limited, particularly with regard to whether short-term vitamin Dsupplementation can modify resting inflammatory status and the acute inflammatory response to repeated supramaximal exercise.

Key Takeaways

  • 01However, human evidence remains limited, particularly with regard to whether short-term vitamin Dsupplementation can modify resting inflammatory status and the acute inflammatory response to repeated supramaximal exercise. [Grześkiewicz Katarzyna (2026)]
  • 02After 21 days, resting 25(OH)D increased in the vitamin Dgroup by +55.7% (p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in placebo (+0.5%, p = 1.000). [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026)]
  • 033 3 3 3 3 For inflammatory biomarkers, significant Group &#215; supplementation phase interactions were observed for IL-1&#946;, IL-6, and IL-10, whereas no interaction was found for IL-1RA. [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026)]
  • 04Mieszkowski et&#160;al., 2021a Stankiewicz et&#160;al., 2023 McFadden et&#160;al., 2022 Nemkov et&#160;al., 2025 An excessive inflammatory response to strenuous exercise is increasingly recognized as a factor that may impair athletic performance, recovery, and overall athlete health (;). [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Vitamin D Exercise Recovery Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation. - However, human evidence remains limited, particularly with regard to whether short-term vitamin Dsupplementation can modify resting inflammatory status and the acute inflammatory response to repeated supramaximal exercise. [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026); evidence level 2] - After 21 days, resting 25(OH)D increased in the vitamin Dgroup by +55.7% (p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in placebo (+0.5%, p = 1.000). [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026); evidence level 2] - 3 3 3 3 3 For inflammatory biomarkers, significant Group &#215; supplementation phase interactions were observed for IL-1&#946;, IL-6, and IL-10, whereas no interaction was found for IL-1RA. [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026); evidence level 2] - Mieszkowski et&#160;al., 2021a Stankiewicz et&#160;al., 2023 McFadden et&#160;al., 2022 Nemkov et&#160;al., 2025 An excessive inflammatory response to strenuous exercise is increasingly recognized as a factor that may impair athletic performance, recovery, and overall athlete health (;). [Grze&#347;kiewicz Katarzyna (2026); evidence level 2] - Objective This narrative review synthesizes mechanistic and clinical evidence examining whether vitamin D status and supplementation are associated with modulation of selected exercise-responsive exerkines, and it introduces a unifying conceptual model, the "vitamin D-exerkine axis", to frame potential points of interaction between vitamin D signaling and the exercise-induced secretome. [Kim DH (2026); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. Effects of 21-day vitamin D supplementation on sports performance and exercise-induced inflammation: a randomized double-blind trial
  2. The interplay between vitamin D status and exerkine signaling: implications for exercise adaptation in athletes: narrative review.