Quick Answer
Theacrine Cognition Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Results Compared to pre-dose, CDT improved performance on the Flanker Test of Inhibitory Control and improved reaction time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task post-dose.
Key Takeaways
- 01Results Compared to pre-dose, CDT improved performance on the Flanker Test of Inhibitory Control and improved reaction time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task post-dose. [Tartar JL (2021)]
- 02Compared to the placebo, caffeine increased self-reported anxiety whereas the CDT combination increased self-reported alertness. [Tartar JL (2021)]
- 03Physiological measures suggested that increases in delta EEG power and cortisol production are associated with the effects observed in the CDT condition to optimize certain aspects of egamer performance. [Tartar JL (2021)]
- 04Background Involvement in video game activities and competitive video gaming (esports) is a rapidly growing field. [Tartar JL (2021)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 1 reusable source document for Theacrine Cognition Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation.
- Results Compared to pre-dose, CDT improved performance on the Flanker Test of Inhibitory Control and improved reaction time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task post-dose. [Tartar JL (2021); evidence level 4]
- Compared to the placebo, caffeine increased self-reported anxiety whereas the CDT combination increased self-reported alertness. [Tartar JL (2021); evidence level 4]
- Physiological measures suggested that increases in delta EEG power and cortisol production are associated with the effects observed in the CDT condition to optimize certain aspects of egamer performance. [Tartar JL (2021); evidence level 4]
- Background Involvement in video game activities and competitive video gaming (esports) is a rapidly growing field. [Tartar JL (2021); evidence level 4]
Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording.
This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.
Sources