What does the evidence say about Prune Constipation Randomized Trial?

The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Prune Constipation Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation. - LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P Conclusion Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - Purpose Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS. [Pyo DH (2025); evidence level 2] - Results Thai massage significantly reduced constipation severity (-6.71 ± 2.84), pain (-5.55 ± 1.92), and improved stool consistency (-2.03 ± 0.84) compared to the prune and control groups. [Assadollahzadeh A (2025); evidence level 2] - Mechanistically, massage likely improved colonic motility and reduced anorectal discomfort. [Assadollahzadeh A (2025); evidence level 2] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.