What does the evidence say about Phosphatidylserine Exercise Stress Randomized Trial?

The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Phosphatidylserine Exercise Stress Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation. - Conclusions Under the present 14-day experimental conditions, the multi-ingredient protocols containing taurine, caffeine, and phosphatidylserine were associated with more favorable selected cognitive and psychomotor outcomes, 30 m sprint performance, and baseline-adjusted GPS-derived locomotor outcomes than placebo. [Mizera K (2026); evidence level 2] - Background/objectives Cognitive fatigue and impaired psychomotor function may contribute to reductions in football-specific performance during prolonged match-like activity. [Mizera K (2026); evidence level 2] - This study evaluated cognitive, psychomotor, sprint, and football-specific locomotor responses to multi-ingredient protocols containing taurine, caffeine, and either 300 or 600 mg·day -1 of phosphatidylserine in professional male football players. [Mizera K (2026); evidence level 2] - However, evidence on multi-ingredient protocols combining taurine, caffeine, and phosphatidylserine (PS) remains limited in professional athletes. [Mizera K (2026); evidence level 4] - Results : Compared with placebo, the TCP group was associated with more favorable physical, cognitive, and selected game-related outcomes ( p 2 = 0.13-0.20) and smaller fatigue-related declines in sprint performance (-18% vs. [Mizera K (2026); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.