Does Magnesium Taurate Cognition Randomized Trial work?

Updated July 2026

Quick Answer

Magnesium Taurate Cognition Randomized Trial has evidence relevant to strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Based on the NSTEA questionnaire, 73% of participants rated the Overall Benefit as Moderate, Good, or Great, with scores that were substantially higher than the NSTEA study found for multi-vitamins, the average of 58 nutraceuticals, and the average of 28 psychiatric and seizure medications.

Key Takeaways

  • 01Based on the NSTEA questionnaire, 73% of participants rated the Overall Benefit as Moderate, Good, or Great, with scores that were substantially higher than the NSTEA study found for multi-vitamins, the average of 58 nutraceuticals, and the average of 28 psychiatric and seizure medications. [Adams JB (2022)]
  • 02Sub-analysis found that the Overall Benefit of ANRC-EP was not significantly affected by gender, age, autism severity, diet quality, self-limited diet, use of psychiatric or seizure medications, dosage, developmental history, intellectual disability, or seizures. [Adams JB (2022)]
  • 03Conclusions This study found that ANRC-EP had significant benefits for a wide range of symptoms, and low adverse effects. [Adams JB (2022)]
  • 04Background Vitamin and mineral supplements are widely used by children and adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). [Adams JB (2022)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 1 reusable source document for Magnesium Taurate Cognition Randomized Trial. This answer focuses on strength of evidence and what the studies can or cannot prove. - Based on the NSTEA questionnaire, 73% of participants rated the Overall Benefit as Moderate, Good, or Great, with scores that were substantially higher than the NSTEA study found for multi-vitamins, the average of 58 nutraceuticals, and the average of 28 psychiatric and seizure medications. [Adams JB (2022); evidence level 4] - Sub-analysis found that the Overall Benefit of ANRC-EP was not significantly affected by gender, age, autism severity, diet quality, self-limited diet, use of psychiatric or seizure medications, dosage, developmental history, intellectual disability, or seizures. [Adams JB (2022); evidence level 4] - Conclusions This study found that ANRC-EP had significant benefits for a wide range of symptoms, and low adverse effects. [Adams JB (2022); evidence level 4] - Background Vitamin and mineral supplements are widely used by children and adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). [Adams JB (2022); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. Vitamin/mineral/micronutrient supplement for autism spectrum disorders: a research survey.