What does the evidence say about Evening Primrose Skin Aging Meta-Analysis?

Updated July 2026

Quick Answer

Evening Primrose Skin Aging Meta-Analysis has evidence relevant to benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Background Nutrition is a modifiable factor in skin ageing, but its effects remain inconsistently quantified.

Key Takeaways

  • 01Background Nutrition is a modifiable factor in skin ageing, but its effects remain inconsistently quantified. [Ng JY (2025)]
  • 02This meta-analysis assessed human studies from the Web of Science on dietary intake and skin ageing, using pooled standardised mean differences (pSMD). [Ng JY (2025)]
  • 031 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 More than two billion people are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies, which often involve multiple, rather than single, nutrients [,]. [Muacevic Alexander (2026)]
  • 04They are widely used to help individuals meet their daily nutrient requirements, support overall health, and address increased nutritional needs associated with pregnancy, aging, and illness. [Muacevic Alexander (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Evening Primrose Skin Aging Meta-Analysis. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation. - Background Nutrition is a modifiable factor in skin ageing, but its effects remain inconsistently quantified. [Ng JY (2025); evidence level 1] - This meta-analysis assessed human studies from the Web of Science on dietary intake and skin ageing, using pooled standardised mean differences (pSMD). [Ng JY (2025); evidence level 1] - 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 More than two billion people are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies, which often involve multiple, rather than single, nutrients [,]. [Muacevic Alexander (2026); evidence level 4] - They are widely used to help individuals meet their daily nutrient requirements, support overall health, and address increased nutritional needs associated with pregnancy, aging, and illness. [Muacevic Alexander (2026); evidence level 4] - According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, MVM use in the USA increased from 35% in 1999-2000 [] to 49-52% between 2011 and 2014, with higher usage among women than men [-]. [Muacevic Alexander (2026); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Sources

  1. Dietary interventions in skin ageing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  2. A to Z of Health: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Multivitamin-Multimineral and Nutraceutical Supplementation