exercise performance

What does the evidence say about Electrolyte Sodium Endurance Performance Trial?

Updated October 2026

Quick Answer

Electrolyte Sodium Endurance Performance Trial has evidence relevant to benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation, but conclusions should stay close to the cited sources. One representative finding is: Performance in the 12-min TT was improved in the CHO + BI condition compared with CHO (+12 W; p = 0.01, g = 1.07).

Key Takeaways

  • 01Performance in the 12-min TT was improved in the CHO + BI condition compared with CHO (+12 W; p = 0.01, g = 1.07). [Norte BR (2026)]
  • 02Sodium bicarbonate (SB) ingestion may improve high-intensity exercise performance in efforts that range from 1 to 60 min; however, to date, no studies have investigated the effects of SB supplementation during exercise, nor its potential to attenuate the fatigue-induced decline in parameters of the power-duration curve during prolonged exercise (i.e., durability). [Norte BR (2026)]
  • 03This study examined the effects of bicarbonate (BI) and carbohydrate (CHO) co-ingestion via a novel gel format during exercise on subsequent sprint and time-trial (TT) performance in cyclists. [Norte BR (2026)]
The current Migaku evidence database contains 2 reusable source documents for Electrolyte Sodium Endurance Performance Trial. This answer focuses on benefits, uncertainty, and practical interpretation. - Performance in the 12-min TT was improved in the CHO + BI condition compared with CHO (+12 W; p = 0.01, g = 1.07). [Norte BR (2026); evidence level 4] - Sodium bicarbonate (SB) ingestion may improve high-intensity exercise performance in efforts that range from 1 to 60 min; however, to date, no studies have investigated the effects of SB supplementation during exercise, nor its potential to attenuate the fatigue-induced decline in parameters of the power-duration curve during prolonged exercise (i.e., durability). [Norte BR (2026); evidence level 4] - This study examined the effects of bicarbonate (BI) and carbohydrate (CHO) co-ingestion via a novel gel format during exercise on subsequent sprint and time-trial (TT) performance in cyclists. [Norte BR (2026); evidence level 4] Evidence levels are sorting aids, not final clinical grades. Level 1 usually indicates systematic-review style evidence, level 2 indicates randomized trials or public-health guidance, and lower levels need more cautious wording. This page is educational. People with medical conditions, pregnancy, medication use, or unusual symptoms should ask a qualified clinician before changing supplements, medication, or treatment routines.

Learn next

Keep learning from this answer

GuideAshwagandha: What the Evidence Actually Says About Stress and CortisolLegacy library material — check the original sources.GuideMagnesium Glycinate benefits: what does the evidence sayLegacy library material — check the original sources.GuideProbiotics: What the Evidence Actually Supports (and What It Doesn't)Legacy library material — check the original sources.GuideL-Theanine: How It Works, What the Evidence Says, and How to Dose ItLegacy library material — check the original sources.DataElectrolytes Endurance Exercise Randomized Trial Evidence TableLegacy library material — check the original sources.DataElectrolyte Supplementation Exercise Performance Randomized Trial Evidence TableLegacy library material — check the original sources.DataElectrolyte Muscle Cramps Randomized Trial Evidence TableLegacy library material — check the original sources.

Sources

  1. Revisiting the need for innovative oral hydration technologies
  2. Bicarbonate and Carbohydrate Co-Ingestion During Exercise in a Novel Gel Format Improves Time-Trial Performance After 3 h of Moderate-Intensity Exercise in Trained Cyclists.