# Lions Mane Memory Meta-analysis: What the Evidence Says Canonical: https://www.migaku.app/guides/lions-mane-memory-meta-analysis-evidence-review Category: evidence-review Summary: Lions Mane Memory Meta-analysis has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are mixed b Last reviewed: 2026-06-08 Reviewed by: Migaku Evidence Review # Lions Mane Memory Meta-analysis: What the Evidence Says ## Quick Answer Lions Mane Memory Meta-analysis has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are mixed biomedical and public-health sources, so conclusions should be framed as evidence-aware guidance rather than medical advice. ## Key Takeaways - This page is generated only from sources stored in the Migaku evidence knowledge base. - Current evidence mix: 2 research article. - Claims should be interpreted with the source type, study design, population, and publication date in mind. - This article is educational and does not replace care from a qualified clinician. ## Evidence Map | Source | Evidence type | Level | Date | Identifier | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | --- | | World Molecular Imaging Congress 2022 | research article | 4 | 2023-01-17 | 10.1007/s11307-022-01794-2 | | 53 <sup>rd</sup> EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Lisbon, Portugal, 11 - 15 September 2017. | research article | 4 | 2017-09-01 | 10.1007/s00125-017-4350-z | ## What The Sources Report - Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. [World Molecular Imaging Congress 2022 (2023); evidence level 4] - Similarly, the specific binding of [C]mG2P001 was also increased with more unlabeled mG2P001 in the incubation media. [World Molecular Imaging Congress 2022 (2023); evidence level 4] - rd EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes: Lisbon, Portugal, 11 - 15 September 2017. [53 <sup>rd</sup> EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Lisbon, Portugal, 11 - 15 September 2017. (2017); evidence level 4] ## How To Read This Evidence Evidence level 1 generally reflects systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Level 2 includes randomized trials, guidelines, or public-health guidance. Level 3 usually reflects observational or narrative-review evidence. Level 4 is weaker or early-stage evidence. The level is a sorting aid, not a final quality grade. ## Practical Interpretation For lions mane memory meta-analysis, the current source set is useful for orientation, but it is not yet broad enough for strong claims. Use cautious language and keep conclusions close to the cited sources. ## Limits Of This First Pass This is a small-batch MVP article. It uses the first ingested sources for this topic and should be expanded with more targeted searches, license review, and human editorial checks before being treated as a definitive review. ## References - World Molecular Imaging Congress 2022 (2023). World Molecular Imaging Congress 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01794-2. PMCID: PMC9844952. PMID: 36648635. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9844952/ - 53 <sup>rd</sup> EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (2017). 53 <sup>rd</sup> EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Lisbon, Portugal, 11 - 15 September 2017.. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4350-z. PMCID: PMC7095843. PMID: 28795195. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095843/ ## Safety Note Health information can change, and individual risk depends on medical history, medications, pregnancy status, age, and diagnosis. Talk with a qualified clinician before changing treatment, supplement, or medication routines.