# Creatine Sleep Meta-analysis: What the Evidence Says
Canonical: https://www.migaku.app/guides/creatine-sleep-meta-analysis-evidence-review
Category: evidence-review
Summary: Creatine Sleep Meta-analysis has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are randomized
Last reviewed: 2026-05-26
Reviewed by: Migaku Evidence Review
# Creatine Sleep Meta-analysis: What the Evidence Says

## Quick Answer

Creatine Sleep Meta-analysis has 2 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are randomized trial, so conclusions should be framed as evidence-aware guidance rather than medical advice.

## Key Takeaways

- This page is generated only from sources stored in the Migaku evidence knowledge base.
- Current evidence mix: 1 randomized trial, 1 narrative review.
- Claims should be interpreted with the source type, study design, population, and publication date in mind.
- This article is educational and does not replace care from a qualified clinician.

## Evidence Map

| Source | Evidence type | Level | Date | Identifier |
| --- | --- | ---: | --- | --- |
| Creatine Supplementation Dose and Duration Are Not Associated with Increased Side Effects: A Structured Review and Study-Level Dose–Response Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | randomized trial | 2 | 2026-04-01 | 10.3390/sports14040137 |
| The emerging and evolving evidence supporting creatine as an ergogenic aid: history and applications | narrative review | 3 | 2026-03-23 | 10.1080/15502783.2026.2646627 |

## What The Sources Report

- As a result, creatine supports better performance in repeated high-intensity efforts and resistance training. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 2]
- Multiple randomized controlled trials have confirmed that creatine leads to greater strength, higher power output, improved repeat sprint or high-intensity performance, and the ability to handle higher training volumes over time. [Gonzalez Drew E. (2026); evidence level 2]

## How To Read This Evidence

Evidence level 1 generally reflects systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Level 2 includes randomized trials, guidelines, or public-health guidance. Level 3 usually reflects observational or narrative-review evidence. Level 4 is weaker or early-stage evidence. The level is a sorting aid, not a final quality grade.

## Practical Interpretation

There is trial evidence in the current set, but population and intervention details still matter. For creatine sleep meta-analysis, the next editorial step is to add more targeted sources and separate strong findings from early or indirect evidence.

## Limits Of This First Pass

This is a small-batch MVP article. It uses the first ingested sources for this topic and should be expanded with more targeted searches, license review, and human editorial checks before being treated as a definitive review.

## References

- Gonzalez Drew E. (2026). Creatine Supplementation Dose and Duration Are Not Associated with Increased Side Effects: A Structured Review and Study-Level Dose–Response Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. DOI: 10.3390/sports14040137. PMCID: PMC13120166. PMID: 42043069. License: CC BY 4.0. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13120166/
- Kerksick Chad (2026). The emerging and evolving evidence supporting creatine as an ergogenic aid: history and applications. DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2026.2646627. PMCID: PMC13011109. PMID: 41870601. License: CC BY 4.0. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13011109/

## Safety Note

Health information can change, and individual risk depends on medical history, medications, pregnancy status, age, and diagnosis. Talk with a qualified clinician before changing treatment, supplement, or medication routines.