# Acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial: What the Evidence Says Canonical: https://www.migaku.app/guides/acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial-evidence-review Category: evidence-review Summary: Acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial has 1 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass Last reviewed: 2026-08-15 Reviewed by: Migaku Evidence Review # Acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial: What the Evidence Says ## Quick Answer Acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial has 1 source documents in the current Migaku evidence database. The strongest available sources in this first pass are randomized trial, so conclusions should be framed as evidence-aware guidance rather than medical advice. ## Key Takeaways - This page is generated only from sources stored in the Migaku evidence knowledge base. - Current evidence mix: 1 randomized trial. - Claims should be interpreted with the source type, study design, population, and publication date in mind. - This article is educational and does not replace care from a qualified clinician. ## Evidence Map | Source | Evidence type | Level | Date | Identifier | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | --- | | Correction to: Acacia fiber or probiotic supplements to relieve gastrointestinal complaints in patients with constipation-predominant IBS: a 4-week randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled intervention trial | randomized trial | 2 | 2025-03-22 | 10.1007/s00394-025-03586-0 | ## What The Sources Report - Linear mixed model analysis showed that Acacia fiber and Probiotic Bla80 significantly increased stool frequency compared to placebo ( < 0.001 and = 0.02) for Acacia fiber and Probiotic Bla80, respectively and should have appeared as shown below A B n n n P P Daily variation in stool frequency and change in stool frequency per week. [JanssenDuijghuijsen Lonneke (2025); evidence level 2] - Linear mixed model analysis showed that Acacia fiber and Probiotic Bla80 significantly increased stool frequency compared to placebo ( < 0.001 and = 0.02) for Acacia fiber and Probiotic Bla80, respectively Several figure subtitles have mistakenly been embedded within the text paragraphs instead of being placed in the caption of Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5. [JanssenDuijghuijsen Lonneke (2025); evidence level 2] ## How To Read This Evidence Evidence level 1 generally reflects systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Level 2 includes randomized trials, guidelines, or public-health guidance. Level 3 usually reflects observational or narrative-review evidence. Level 4 is weaker or early-stage evidence. The level is a sorting aid, not a final quality grade. ## Practical Interpretation There is trial evidence in the current set, but population and intervention details still matter. For acacia-fiber-constipation-randomized-trial, the next editorial step is to add more targeted sources and separate strong findings from early or indirect evidence. ## Limits Of This First Pass This is a small-batch MVP article. It uses the first ingested sources for this topic and should be expanded with more targeted searches, license review, and human editorial checks before being treated as a definitive review. ## References - JanssenDuijghuijsen Lonneke (2025). Correction to: Acacia fiber or probiotic supplements to relieve gastrointestinal complaints in patients with constipation-predominant IBS: a 4-week randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled intervention trial. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-025-03586-0. PMCID: PMC11929710. PMID: 40119929. License: CC BY 4.0. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11929710/ ## Safety Note Health information can change, and individual risk depends on medical history, medications, pregnancy status, age, and diagnosis. Talk with a qualified clinician before changing treatment, supplement, or medication routines.